Main Task: Evaluation

Main Task: All Final Pieces Together

 

Main Task: Peer feedback of Double Page Spread

Peer Feedback of Double Page Spread

 

Good: The house style of this product is good as the colours do not clash so it doesn't strain your eyes, the picture fits well as the text boxes can be fit around the band member, the text boxes behind text make it so that text is readable, also the title text is easily readable due to it fitting in with the house style.
Bad: Use of album covers are bad as they are found images and not originals. Also, most of the main image is covered up so you don't get the full feel of the gig.

Main Task: Final Piece - Double Page Spread

Main Task: Peer Feedback on Contents

Peer Feedback on Contents

 

Good: The colour scheme of the contents works well as it does not clash with other colours, the regulars/features text box is good because it makes it able for us to read the text for the actual content, also, the layout of the contents is good because it is not too complicated and is easy to understand what content is on which page. 

Bad: The white text doesn't fit in with the house style, should have faded text boxes like the text boxes for regulars/features.



Main Task: Final Piece - Contents Page

Main Task: Peer Feedback on Front Cover

Peer Feedback on Front Cover

Good: The Colour scheme is good as it all links together, this is good because you are not looking at lots of different colours which may strain your eyes, the layout of the text is good because it does not cover the main image and is easily readable, also, the Stand first is good because it gives the reader a little hint of what is in the magazine, making the reader want to keep reading.
Bad: The colour could be bland, this means that the cover can seem uninteresting, could maybe add colours which also link to the colour scheme.